I appealed because when I parked there, I felt uneasy about how close I was to the intersection, but took specific note that I was not blocking the cross walk (I knew I needed to do that much). When I came back out that afternoon, my car was gone and I walked home. I was upset and flustered and rather clueless for what offense I had occured to get towed, so I spent an hour studying the parking regulation laws here: http://www.louisvilleky.gov/PARC/Parking+Regulations.htm
Eventually, I found the law that I was suspecting may have been a problem: I violated
http://www.louisvilleky.gov/PARC/parkinggenerally.htm#72.035
72.035N, "No parking within 30 feet of an intersection." But boo! Everyone parks within 10-15 feet of an intersection. It was stupid but I had definitely broken that law. It was still interesting looking up all of this because I learned about many ambiguous parking laws that not only are unheard of but unenforced as well.
When I went to go get my car, I found out that I'd gotten a citation for parking in a cross walk, violation of ordinance 72.035F. Dad came out with me to the impound lot and I told him my story of innocence and he supported me in an attempt to appeal. When I got home, I drove back to the spot where I was towed and alas, it was still there (which is strange but perhaps they towed more than one car from that spot that day). I parked my car and got out to take photos for my hearing.


I also printed out the list of ordinances that included my real offense and the tried offense. If I would have gotten a ticket for the 30 ft law, I wouldn't have gotten towed. That was a lot of the motive, getting back at least $120 in a time where I was already pretty broke being after Christmas and all.
At the hearing, I only needed to talk to one person, and the officer who wrote the ticket was not present. We compared my pictures to the pictures taken by the officer (which were angled very poorly almost to make a perspective illusion that I may have been in the cross walk). Sure, the officer would have to take my word that my reproduction of my parking job was legit, but she didn't say anything about that. My main argument was that I felt I deserved a reimbursement mostly for the sake that I got written a false citation. She tried to argue with me a bit but ended the hearing at one of my comments saying, "well, remember in the future not to park so close." I thought I had won, I felt like my argument was legit, and sure I don't know if I put it forth as organized as I should have, but she gave me the impression that I had done the job.
Dad called me a few days later to let me know I'd received a letter of my denied appeal. He says that the government just doesn't make financial room for reimbursing citations after appeals, or something. It was too bad. I thought it was fun looking up all the ordinances and feeling like I was some pre-law type trying to get a go at fighting a case. Whatever I guess. As for me and political sciences, I'll be taking the closest thing I'll get to it next semester in an honors seminar called Environmental Law. Ooh.




